Crypto News

Demand For Polkadot Slumps; Where’s It Headed Next?

Polkadot has displayed negative sentiments on the chart today. Over the last three months, the coin had continued to hold its prices above the $14.40 price mark. At press time today, DOT was trading extremely close to that level. This comes after Polkadot had registered a price hike to $19 during the third week of last month. The bulls had tried very hard to defend the prices at the $16 price support level. DOT went on a slide and it hasn’t halted since. Prices of the asset tried to trade above the aforementioned support line and tried to push the price north but it seems like aiming for $24 could be far fetched for the coin at the moment. As prices have considerably fallen in the past week, buyers’ interest in the coin has also been waning off and that has added to the bearish thesis of the coin. Polkadot Price Analysis: Four Hour Chart Polkadot has been closing in on the support line of $14 as the coin was priced at $14.64 at the time of writing. The coin had managed to keep prices above the $14 support level for the past three months but at the moment, DOT was about to break through the support line. This has also suggested a fall in buying strength and that has caused prices to travel southwards. The volume of assets exchanged was seen in red and the bar was taller than the previous one which could mean an increase in selling pressure. DOT is trading on a three-month low price level and fall from this level would mean that it would trade near the $13.70 price mark. In case of a price reversal, the immediate resistance for the coin stood at $15.40 and then at $16.68. Related Reading | Polkadot, Vechain Founders Pledge Over $10 Million In Crypto To Ukraine Technical Analysis Price of the coin was seen trading below the 20-SMA as that indicated an increase of sellers in the market. Buyers have lost momentum in the market and sellers were responsible for driving prices ahead. Corresponding to the same reading, the Relative Strength Index continued on a downward slide. Buyers had exited the market as the coin was nearing the oversold territory. A push in the buying strength can help prices rise up above the 20-SMA and 50-SMA as seen in the third week of April. Over the last 24 hours, DOT lost 2% of its market value and in the past week, the coin registered a 16.2% downfall. MACD which is responsible for determining a price trend had portrayed green signal bars on the chart in anticipation that prices might see an upward swing but as the prices dipped, the green signal bars have lost their vigour. This indicated a change in price momentum and that could mean a continued downslide for DOT. Bollinger Bands (Blue) is an indicator that ascertains price volatility had depicted a squeeze which meant that volatility has decreased. This reading could mean a continued bearish price action for the coin over  immediate trading sessions. Related Reading | Bitcoin Indicator Hits Historical Low Not Seen Since 2015 Featured image from, chart from

Crypto News

Solana Prices South Bound; Will It Revisit $80 Soon?

Solana depreciated by almost 6% over the last 24 hours as the broader market started to get choppy. Bitcoin was seen trading below the $40,000 mark while Ethereum broke the support level of $3,000. The global market currency cap stood at $1.94 Trillion after a fall of 6% over the past day. Solana had depicted considerable recovery on charts as it broke subsequent price ceilings over the past week. The coin had managed to revisit the $110 level which the coin hovered near thrice in the past week or so. Following the recent dip, buyers decided to exit the market as the coin witnessed a sell-off as seen on the four-hour chart. Solana Price Analysis: Four Hour Chart Solana was priced at $100 at the time of writing. The altcoin lost close to 6% of its value over the last 24 hours. SOL had noted a sharp recovery on the 18th of April and it challenged its resistance mark of $110. At press time, SOL was aiming for its nearest support level of $96. The coin was trading in a descending trendline, which signifies that SOL could continue in its downward trajectory. From the four-hour chart, it signalled that Solana was undergoing a price correction. If the bears continue to exert dominance, Solana would immediately fall by 4%. A fall from the $96 price level would push prices to $87 and then finally undergo a depreciation of 18% and land at $80. Trading volume had dipped but was in the green, which could also mean that buying pressure was increasing at the time of writing. Related Reading | Is Bitcoin Gonna See Another Big Drop Soon? Historical Trend May Say Yes Technical Analysis Solana had experienced a bout of buying pressure when the coin soared on April 18th. At the time of writing, the coin witnessed a surplus of sellers. On the Relative Strength Index, the indicator was seen below the the half-line which is indicative of increased selling strength, however there was a slight uptick on the RSI. This uptick could mean that buying strength would pick up over the next trading sessions. On the 20-SMA, SOL was placed underneath the 20-SMA line. This referred to sellers driving the price momentum in the market. Solana was on a continued price correction as seen from the above chart. MACD which is responsible for determining the market momentum indicated bearishness in the market. On the aforementioned indicator, the coin displayed a bearish crossover at the time of writing. It also displayed small red histograms which signified that SOL would continue on a negative price action. Investing in Solana at the moment doesn’t seem to be a wise decision. For the coin to see some respite, it had to break above the $110 price mark and trade over it for a considerable period of time. The Parabolic SAR which determines a stop-loss order, has demonstrated dotted lines above the price candlesticks which is synonymous to a negative price movement. Related Reading | Bitcoin Under Pressure Near $40K, Here Are 2 Reasons Why That Could Change Soon Featured image from, charts from

Crypto News

CoinEx Security Team: The Security Risks of THORChain (RUNE)

According to THORChain’s treasury report for Q1 2022 released on April 1, the chain registered a growth in revenue despite the twofold impact of persistent market sluggishness and highly unstable geopolitical factors. Public data shows that THORChain recorded $2.17 billion in revenue in Q1 2022. THORChain, acclaimed as the “cross-chain version of UniSwap”, gained a foothold in the cross-chain trading market relying on its unique advantages and earned extensive recognition among investors. Behind all these glamours, THORChain is also deeply troubled by hacking. The chain suffered frequent security breaches since it was launched on Ethereum, a fact that casts doubt on its security. On April 11, THORChain tweeted about phishing attacks, warning users not to interact with [DeTHOR] or other unknown tokens within their wallets, which once again raised concerns about its security issues. While building a sound security system for CoinEx products, the CoinEx security team also keeps track of security incidents in the blockchain space to help users better understand the security of different projects from the perspective of technical security and mitigate the investment risk. Aiming to improve the security criteria for the blockchain sector, the CoinEx security team has analyzed the security risks of THORChain (RUNE). The team hopes that THORChain could note and mitigate the following risks by optimizing the relevant smart contract codes. In addition, this article is also a warning for users, reminding them to be more aware of asset security and avoid asset losses. How secure is THORChain (RUNE)? Through analysis of the contract code and logic of THORChain (RUNE), the CoinEx security team has found the following risks: To begin with, let’s check out the contract code of THORChain (RUNE): We can tell that RUNE is a pretty standard ERC-20 token. It should be noted that apart from the ERC-20 interface, THORChain (RUNE) offers an additional interface: According to transferTo (as shown in the picture above), THORChain (RUNE) uses tx.origin, which is one of the causes behind its security risks. Here, we should explain the difference between tx.origin and msg.sender: The below picture describes what happens when a regular address calls the smart contract: In such cases, msg.sender = account.address, and tx.origin = account.address, which means that msg.sender is just the same as tx.origin. The following is what happens when an account calls contract A, and contract A calls contract B: When contract A calls contract B (as shown above), we can tell that msg.sender equals tx.origin in contract A. However, in contract B, msg.sender = contractA.address, while tx.origin = account.address. Therefore, tx.origin is like a global variable that traverses the entire call stack and returns the address of the account that originally sent the transaction. This is the key issue: to date, almost all known attacks against THORChain (RUNE) relate to tx.origin. Let’s now find out how attackers steal users’ RUNE tokens through tx.origin: Attack No.1: Pilfer a Goat from a Herd Addresses on Ethereum are divided into external addresses and contract addresses. Transferring ETH to these two types of addresses through external addresses is fundamentally different. The Official Documentation of solidity states that a contract address must implement a receive Ether function before making transfers. In light of the features of tx.origin, hackers may build an Attack contract: When the Attack contract receives an ETH transfer from a user, it will “pilfer a goat from a herd” — the contract will steal the user’s RUNE tokens in the process. Attack No.2: Internal Attack An Internal Attack is a special type of attack. When trying to steal a user’s RUNE through an Internal Attack, the hacker needs to have a medium token. Moreover, the token must also call third-party contracts. According to the transfer records of RUNE on Ethereum, some attackers hacked RUNE through AMP Token transfers. AMP Token uses the ERC-1820 standard to manage Hook registration and examine whether Hook is registered upon each transfer. If Hook has been registered, then the Hook will be called. The contract code of AMP Token shows that the final implementation of the transfer is: _transferByPartition. Meanwhile, there are two calls involving transferHook: _callPreTransferHooks (before the transfer) and _callPostTransferHooks (after the transfer). In particular, _callPreTransferHooks is for the from address, while _callPostTransferHooks is for the to address (i.e. the receiving address). For regular users, stealing tokens from themselves is pointless. Therefore, attackers may exploit _callPostTransferHooks. Let’s now check out the codes of _callPostTransferHooks. IAmpTokensRecipient(recipientImplementation).tokensReceived() We can tell that the only callback that attackers could exploit is IAmpTokensRecipient(recipientImplementation).tokensReceived() Next, we will illustrate how this call can be used to transfer a user’s RUNE while making an AMP Token transfer. Step 1: A call contract is needed (as shown below): Step 2: Deploy the contract to obtain the Attack Address. Step 3: Call the ERC-1820 contract interface (setInterfaceImplementer) to register the interface. ERC-1820 Address: 0x1820a4B7618BdE71Dce8cdc73aAB6C95905faD24 Contract interface: setInterfaceImplementer(address toAddr, bytes32 interfaceHash, address implementer) In particular, toAddr is the receiving address of the AMP transfer, interfaceHash为AmpTokensRecipient的hash: 0xfa352d6368bbc643bcf9d528ffaba5dd3e826137bc42f935045c6c227bd4c72a interfaceHash is the hash of AmpTokensRecipient: 0xfa352d6368bbc643bcf9d528ffaba5dd3e826137bc42f935045c6c227bd4c72a Implementer is the Attack Address obtained in Step 2. Step 4: Lure a user to transfer AMP to the toAddr to trigger a callback, and steal his RUNE at the same time. Attack No.3: Phishing Attack As its name suggests, in a phishing attack, the attacker promises to give away incredible benefits to lure users into performing certain contract operations. Here, we will introduce a common phishing attack. Step 1: The attacker issues an ERC-20 token, and may write it into any contract interface that involves signatures. Step 2: Create a trading pair on Uniswap or any other swap; Step 3: Offer airdrops to all users/addresses who hold RUNE tokens; The initial work of the phishing attack is basically completed through the above these steps. Next, the attacker only has to wait for users to trade on a swap, and users risk losing their RUNE once they perform operations such as approve, transfer, etc. In addition, in order to further verify the security risk of THORChain contract code, CoinEx has discussed with the security team from SlowMist and PeckShield, two well-known security agencies in the industry. Confirmed by SlowMist and PeckShield, the security risk mentioned above does exist. So far, we have covered several types of attacks, as well as the security risks that users are exposed to. How should the project team optimize the contract code to make itself more secure and protect users’ assets? The only answer is to be cautious about using tx.origin. How can regular users mitigate risks and protect their assets in the face of attacks that seem unavoidable? The CoinEx security team offers the following suggestions: For Attack No.1: When making a transfer, keep track of the estimated Gas consumption. For a regular ETH transfer, a Gas fee of 21,000 is more than enough. Be careful if the Gas consumption far exceeds that figure. For Attack No.2: Isolate your tokens by adopting different wallets. You can store different tokens in different addresses. Extra caution is needed when it comes to the hot wallet address offered by exchanges. For Attack No.3: Greed is the source of all evil. Do not blindly participate in any airdrop event. Security has always been a top concern in the blockchain sector. All players, including project teams and exchanges, should prioritize security during project operation, keep users’ assets safe and secure, and jointly promote the sound growth of the blockchain industry.

Bitcoin Blockchain Crypto News

IOST sets up $100M fund to push growth of EVM multi-chain ecosystem

The IOST Foundation, the organization behind the IOST blockchain, a gas-efficient proof-of-believability-powered smart contract platform, announced today together with venture capital institutions and ecosystem partners, the launch of a new $100 million USD incentive fund for EVM developers, aiming to incubate projects and propel the growth of IOST’s multi-chain ecosystem. On March 31, 2022, IOST […]

The post IOST sets up $100M fund to push growth of EVM multi-chain ecosystem appeared first on CryptoNinjas.